Split views on models for post Brexit UK trade

There are split views about the five models for post Brexit UK trade and the suitability of trading model.We have ruled out Norway model as the per capita fee is the same as UK is paying. It has full access to the single market and got to accept majority of EU laws. It has to sign up to all the rules of the club including common regulations and standards. Norway is a member of the European Economic Area [EEA] and has free movement of labour meaning people from across the EU are free to live and work in Norway. Although it is exempt from EU rules on agriculture, fisheries, justice and home affairs. It has no say over how the rules of the single market are created. 

Switzerland model is a member of the European Free Trade Association [EFA]. access to EU market is governed by series of bilateral agreements, covers some but not all areas of trade. makes a smaller financial contribution smaller than Norway, does not have a general duty to apply EU laws but does have to implement some EU regulations to enable trade, and free movement of people. We have ruled out Switzerland who has a free trade agreement with the EU, and a number of agreements which give it access to the single market for most of its industries. But it does not have full access to the single market for its banking sector and other parts of the services sector, which together make up almost 80% of the UK economy.

We have ruled out the Turkey model as it is a customs union with the EU meaning no tariffs or quotas on industrial goods exported to EU countries and has to apply EU's external tariff on goods imported from outside the EU. Turkey is not part of EEA or EFT but does have a customs union with the EU. The customs union does not apply to agricultural goods or services. Turkey has got no say on the tariffs it has to impose on goods it imports from non EU countries as it has to apply the EU's common external tariff to those goods and is not involved in setting it.

We have ruled out the Canada model who has a Ceta free trade deal with the EU. Ceta is Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. It has not come out in force yet, gets rid of most tariffs on goods, but excludes some food items and services and stipulates need to prove where goods are made such 'as made in Canada' which imposes extra costs to prevent imports entering the EU's back door. It gives Canada preferential access to the EU single market without all the obligations that Norway and Switzerland face, eliminating most trade tariffs. Eggs and chicken are not covered. The services sector is only partially covered by Ceta. Ceta deal would not give UK financial services the EU market access that they have now. It would be hard for London based banks to get passporting rights for their services in the EU. Firms would have to comply with EU product standards and technical requirements without having any say in setting them. 

We can think about the Singapore and Hong Kong approach. Hong Kong does not charge tariff on importation and exportation of goods. Import and Export licensing is kept to a minimum. There are no trade restrictions and Hong Kong' free trade policy means the chinese special administrative region maintains no barriers on trade. No tariffs of any kind could have a strongly negative effect on the UK agriculture and manufacturing sectors such as importing goods like food and steel would in many cases be cheaper, than producing them in the UK. It is a unilateral free trade approach.

We could have World Trade Organisation WTO but has sets rules for international trade that applies to all members, no free movement or financial contribution, no obligation to apply EU laws although traded goods would still have to meet EU standards, some tariffs would be in place on trade with EU, trade in services would be restricted. The UK and EU would be obliged to apply to each other the tariffs, and other trade restrictions they apply to the rest of the world. That is because the WTO rules allow countries to discriminate in favour of a trade partner only in a limited number of circumstances including a full bilateral trade. UK could adopt a unilateral free trade policy, dropping all tariffs, and relying on the WTO's framework.

If UK wants to retain preferential access to the markets of the 52 countries covered by these agreements, it would have to re negotiate trade deals with all of them. Britain is a large market so there is a clear incentive for other countries to negotiate a deal. It would be in nobody's interests to interrupt the current trading partnerships. We have to be realistic which models are best for UK. We know that we cannot have free movement of labour if it involves immigration or uncontrolled migration. UK needs control over the borders. This could force Britain to trade under the WTO rules which involves higher tariffs for a period of time while a deal is thrashed out. We do not know how long that will take.

The single market has disadvantages as worker mobility is not as great as hoped. Many businesses still see barriers. Monopolies may be formed which can cause market failure. More choice and opportunities for work throughout the EU due to migrants and immigrants. The four freedoms of the single market, goods, capital, services and people are a bit too complicated. The advantages are consumers have lower prices. Businesses have more consumers, and are able to exploit economies of scale. The single market is an association of countries trading with each other without restriction and tariffs created on 1st January 1993. The four freedoms are goods, capital, services and people. A single market is frontier free although several barriers remain such as differences in national tax systems, differences in parts of the services sector and different requirements for e-commerce. In addition separate national markets still exists for financial services sector, energy and transport. Laws concerning the recognition of professional qualifications also may not be harmonised. We cannot really enjoy political benefits only the economic benefits. Integration are mostly economical, and the costs mostly political. We are in overall much better off out, than in and adopt a new model that has not got restrictions, no free trade movement, no tariffs, no rules and no implementation of laws.

We need to look into the Singapore model more closely as it could be dodgy, and the WTO could be the alternative.

1st July 2016

World trading is seeing ever stronger competition for resources, we cannot disregard the rules of world trading, and have to avoid conflicts of interests in world trading. Countries does not want weak economies so it is much better when all countries do cooperate to do free trading, and without free movement.

There have been persistent efforts to maintain a monopoly on geopolitical dominance by some partners. This kind of monopoly weakens, suppresses and pitting their rivals against each other which causes inequalities in trading.

We seek united and inseparable security in economy for the whole world. It is necessary to push for a fair world order based on the principles of united and inseparable security and collective responsibility with close full cooperation.

The world wants and stands for equal partnership, that respects the interests of both sides. 

Brexit have revealed that the world must change to have proper legitimate equal world trading and with the right rules.

We do not need policies, and the countries does not need to create policies when it comes to world trading. The Brexit is a wake up call to get together to form partnerships and be amicable bringing profitability.

The European Union is only a very small part of the world and it cannot dictate to any country wishing to trade freely and without trade movement. All countries needs to have access within the world trading sphere. No one wants to tie ourselves to a single market, but seek global opportunities that would be open to us for building up trade between individual EU countries, Russia, Asia and the Americas.

It has got to be a pragmatic world trading centre open to all countries all over the world.

Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty has been triggered by democracy, the government of UK can finalise the triggering, and confirming that we can have world trading to think of.

All countries will become independent actors even nations. Britain should start behaving now for an independent trade policy belonging to World Trade policy. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should behave internationally as if it was independent, and it will eventually find it natural that it should be.

We should start discussing the scope for our own trade agreements. It is going to happen and it would be neglect if we did not get going soon.

This would be a new chapter in changing the world if all countries and nations participate in world trading in fair world order.
Based on the principles of united and  and inseparable security and collective responsibility with close full cooperation. 

Article 50 of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty is now ready to activate

It would be a breach of basic principles of freedom, democracy, equality and rule of law, if David Cameron would leave the triggering of the Article 50 Lisbon Treaty to his successor in September. Article 50 has got to be triggered now, as people have voted Leave in the Brexit referendum. David Cameron gave his word that he would respect the wishes and the will of the people to be divorced from EU. There will be enormity of consequences if the Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty is not done today. David Cameron is stalling, and he does not want to be the one to trigger the Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty because he voted 'Remain'. We have had confirmation that there will not be a 2nd EU Referendum. The conservative government cannot afford to delay to trigger the Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty as their reputation would be in tatters. Once the Article 50 has been activated, it is going to take a long time to get a final divorce anyway. The activation will confirm that the divorce can begin, and is the affirmation of the 'Leave' campaign. It is not sensible to have talks before the activation of the Article 50, as Merkel is trying to divert the triggering by saying there is to be no cherry picking. Brussels has got no right to try and do a deal or deals before the activation of Article 50. The EU officials have got no right to refuse us a trade market without tariffs. It is happening all over the world, and it is world trade. We started off as merchants travelling all over the world to do trade and bartering, hundred of years ago. EU is violating international law by creating their own policy on who should trade, and who should have tariffs. This is blatant discrimination and racism. This trading between Europe and the United Kingdom existed for hundreds of years before the European Union was created. We cannot have a stalemate and the confirmation and announcement of a divorce must start now, and then talk later. It is entirely up to the departing member state to trigger article 50, by issuing formal notification of intention to leave, no one, in Brussels, Berlin or Paris, can force it to. 

There may be no mechanism that can force a state to withdraw from the European Union except that democracy and the referendum requests it. 

Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty is there to allow withdrawal, but no other party has the right to invoke Article 50, no other state or institution can. ​ 

While delay is highly undesirable politically, legally there is nothing that can compel a state to withdraw

​ except that democracy can force its hand to activate​

.

​ 

Democracy has got legal and political rights to invoke the Article 50 to allow withdrawal from the European Union as part of the divorce for the United Kingdom.​ Therefore. democracy has to confirm that notification can be done in writing. 

It has to be done in an unequivocal manner, with the explicit intent to trigger article 50. Negotiations to leave

​,​

 and on the future relationship can only begin after such a formal notification.

It is indeed the intention of the British government to leave the EU, it is therefore in its interest to notify as soon as possible.

​ We have to confirm the rejection, so we can move on, due to the fact the people of United Kingdom is very unhappy about staying in the European Union. ​The situation could get really nasty if there is no triggering of the Article 50 and the present government will suffer the consequences.

Former British Prime Minister David Cameron cannot be expected to start negotiation before United Kingdom's exit from the EU and was expected to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty in the European Union. This is not going to happen, as David Cameron does not want it to. He has left no one at the helm of the ship sailing into uncharted waters.

The former Prime Minister and Politicians are servants to the people of this nation, therefore superpower democracy is now in charge. Superpower democracy has now taken over the the helm of the ship and is ready without delay to invoke Article 50 of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty of the Lisbon Treaty.

Acting in the interests of the people, we cannot all face uncertainty and instability and the people must move on acting in the European Union and United Kingdom interests.

On Tuesday 28th June 2016 ​on behalf of the people in the United Kingdom, we invoke the Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, respecting the wishes and the will of the people. We have decided to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements. We do not wish to negotiate, and wished to be divorced from the European Union.

We wish to state that we want to have friendly future relationship with the European Union without ties and commitment meaning United Kingdom does not want to have EU laws, regulations and policies. That we want independence, and still be free to trade in a different way, that has got nothing to do with EU officials and their policies. United Kingdom does not wish to take part in the functioning of the European Union while as an independent country, and does not wish to take part in talks, discussions and the making of decisions of the European Union. And United Kingdom states that after withdrawal, has got no intention to rejoin, and will not in future request to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

The withdrawal to leave the European Union in the 59 year old history of the bloc is confirmed without consent to respect the wishes and the will of the people of United Kingdom after the successful referendum. It is the United Kingdom's intention not to cut ties with continental counterparts while there are business contracts that are legally binding. We are obliged to protect foreign business interests.

Foreign Ministers of the European Union's six founding members called on the United Kingdom to swiftly move ahead with a divorce from the European Union. These EU officials have got no power over United Kingdom once the divorce is final and binding.

Once the exit declaration has been made by the European Union, talks will begin with mutual consent between United Kingdom and the European Union. To define the United Kingdom's new relationship with the European Union to confirm cooperation, stability, security and all spheres of the European Union and the United Kingdom.

I, now as superpower democracy, have activated the button, and invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty for a divorce from the European Union.

Kind regards

Linda Mary Breeze

We can still fight for environmental issues to be resolved without the European Union

We do not need to vote 'Remain' for fear of bonfire of regulations designed to fight climate change and protect wildlife as well as the countryside. We do not need EU legislation that has to do with environment such as beach pollution, waste etc.

Although the British government has got a responsibility to keep environmental issues up to standards, we do have the United Nations who is committed to worldwide environmental issues, and have got international law to help protect the worldwide environment and climate change.

Thankfully we have got Greenpeace and other environmentally organisations to help put pressure and make their voices heard.

We do need to continue to make our drinking and bathing water safe, our air cleaner, our fishing industry more sustainable and our climate safer. We can continue to protect our nature, introduction of bees, and habitats.

We have made so many improvements and got a much better quality of life even for the wildlife and the birds.

We can make sure it is on the political agenda to continue improving and resolving environmental issues. I do believe that we can end the bureaucratic nightmare, and freeing red tape restrictions is the way forward out of 'Leave' campaign.

Although more needs to be done, there have been great achievements on environmental issues.

UK Parliament will be able to make changes should it choose for the sake of improving and making things happen positively.

Planning for a new future before and after the divorce from EU

Planning for the future is on top of the agenda, but nothing can be done until after we have a divorce finalised from the EU. The divorce is needed quickly as we have no time to lose and things needs to get done. We need unity, stability, credibility and competence. Britain's future will be secured as soon as we have the divorce from the European Union.

Britain will be stronger and better economically and, we have to see that no business will suffer. We can have free market and cultivate global trade.

Moodys have got no right to downgrade Britain's economic outlook with a astronomical loss of money. That is scaremongering and panic. Moodys, Standard and Poor etc should be banned from making further economic forecasts to protect the economy.

I believe that the European Union will only become a Union of Trade and Financial Transactions.

We need to think about fisheries, agriculture and migrant policies for humanitarian reasons. These policies can be freely discussed in the House of Commons, and hope there is a conclusion with a plan.

Financial stability is on the agenda as well, and making sure it is kept under control. We are thankful that we will have billions of pounds to spare with the Brexit, and we could have millions more if we leave NATO.

I am sorry that two million people have unsuccessfully tried to have another referendum. It was inevitable and irreversible, and really too late. There is no going back once you have had a referendum. The consolation are things will get better and brighter.

I am shocked that Hilary Benn got sacked, and he should be reinstated immediately. Jeremy Corbyn is the one who should be sacked, or have resigned, because as leader he supported the 'Remain' campaign. There was no vote of confidence against Corbyn, and he is a very lousy leader with no real intentions and interests for his party.

The legislative programme required to create the new policies which will be domestic policies to replace European policies. The parliamentary legislative agenda will have to wait until after the school holidays unless the MPs agree to work during the school holidays and, have holidays during the autumn/winter time.

There will be other laws and priorities and I am sure there will be time for them. Vote Leave did set out a plan of action earlier this month, including repealing the European Communities Act so EU treaties are no longer part of UK law. Writing the EU regulations that govern everything from genetically modified food to garden seeds and cleaners into UK law so Parliament can change or remove them in its own time after Brexit. MPs cannot pass any more laws until our future is more certain with a final divorce. Anything written down will have to ask for my approval and permission before it becomes law.

It may be a big job and a challenge, but with common sense, logic and reasoning of the EU laws that UK wants to keep will be crucial political decisions on which MPs peers will want a regular say with my help.

I will be away for four days from the 4th July, but will try and keep an eye on things, but will not be able to communicate. MPs are free to take that week off if they wish, to work on other days. Hopefully everything is under control during that time.

Scotland

It has come to light that the Scottish leader Nicola Sturgeon is inciting hatred, division, disintegration for England, and is so very demanding to have another referendum to stay in the EU. She is a total hypocrite having said she wanted Scotland to be independent, only to find she wanted Scotland to be  in the European Union. This is insane, as Scotland would never have independence with the European Union. Scotland have lost two referendums, and there is no way Westminster will fork out billions of pounds for Scotland to stay in the EU. Nicola Sturgeon should be sacked for supporting 'Remain' campaign, and not behaving with decorum in the first place ranting and raving most of the time. This must stop.

All Leaders must be neutral and impartial in any campaigns. It must not happen again for all Leaders to act completely the opposite, and stir up trouble during the process of campaigning. It was the most irresponsible behaviour to date, and the most horrible, playing dirty politics in the public eye.

Holyrood

Holyrood has got no power to veto UK. It also got no power to implement EU legislation. In fact Holyrood has got no powers over the EU referendum to make any changes. There is no such thing as withholding consent, as all the people in Scotland have voted for a 'Leave' campaign. It shows that there is a very weak leadership if Holyrood cannot rule effectively on its own, and wanting to depend on the EU laws and regulations much to the detriment to the rest of the nation.

Labour Party

There have been discord in the Labour Party and the root cause, is that some members have never accepted Corbyn's election, and never had proper leadership election amongst members of the Labour Party. There is clearly disunity in the Labour Party with a string of shadow cabinet members quitting with more walkouts. To rectify the root cause and bring unity to the Labour Party. When one member is elected by the public in the general election, it should have sought approval and permission by having a secret ballot  and command the support of the Labour Party. The votes must be reasonable and makes sense, as it is the qualities and intellect of leadership that we are looking for. The Labour Party has been damaged by a weak not so intelligent and, unreasonable leader. I would like everyone get together to say Noes or Ayes to having Corbyn staying as leader. Then the rest can be sorted out peacefully for a proper inside election among members of the Labour Party. Only healing can then begin within the Labour Party.

Historic Day for Democracy and Independence

It is a great day for democracy winning against the European Union who have bombarded us with threats, more poor governance and lower standards of living. It is victory and independence for UK. We no longer, want the kind of membership that the European Union wanted. UK is rich in heritage and tradition which needs to be preserved. Brexit is now calling for a new world order protecting heritage, celebrating history and the people of UK.

Scotland and Northern Ireland have been trying to break up for years. We can unite if we all find common ground and have shared undivided politics. Just because we chose to leave, does not mean we cannot trade with European countries. The European Union can no longer tell us what to do. It does not mean we will be isolated from the rest of the world including Europe and Ireland. We succeeded in getting back our own country to keep the Englishness of life.

The people who voted for Brexit is very brave and very bright ignoring all the rubbish advice given by financiers, economists, politicians and what have you. It is their downfall as they got so greedy in the first place, and should not have made so much money in the first place. They took advantage of Europe. It was David Cameron who supported the wealthy and the elites which is why he did not want to exit EU.

The North East suffered because London was too greedy with corruption, and had its own political class. The break with EU can be straightforward and swift if done the right way and with the right governance. That is without compromising real politics.

There have been lies, deceits and corruption from institutions, authorities being in divided campaigning, and experts and public servants were biased. Trust in politicians were at a very low ebb. There were always scepticism, suspicion and distrust. Four months of wasted campaigning and wasted money spent on 'Vote Remain' was obvious, but it resulted in getting our country back.

Our precious democracy was damaged, that with good governance, it will be healed and restored to its former glory and the people be well again emotionally, mentally, physically and spiritually. We now hope for new social and economic change and make progress.

We now have new democracy and David Cameron have resigned. But he needs to go now as we need a new world order. If he went quickly, democracy hoped there will be an emergency cabinet with all different party members. Then our hope would be to get rid of the most unpopular foreign policy which is NATO.

We need to cease membership of NATO and sever ties with it because we need to defend our own country with our own soldiers and weaponry etc. We do not approve of NATO protecting borders in Europe, and its own military solution policy, and expansionism with its own nuclear weapons. NATO has been secretly protecting Ukraine while UK foreign department has been supporting Ukraine in many ways. This is the first project getting rid of NATO to start with, and it must be done asap. If the politicians will not listen, we could have another referendum voting against it.

We need to be free from NATO.

This would be the start of a new world order we so desperately need.

There is no real democratisation in the European Union

No real democratisation of the European Union

We need to dramatically change the European Union, to rebuild, reorganise, restructure, and strengthen. We need to get rid of bureaucracy, economic shambles, mental cruelty, undo some european laws and policies that are not applicable.

Politicians who are EU bureaucrats and international financiers including the most feared Angela Merkel have inflicted economic cruelty on a mass scale, trashing the lives of millions as they do so, escaping being tried for injustice and treason. They supported austerity, and became dictators.

For those who want Europe to have a future that is not one of falling living standards and rising insecurity, it is the policies of Merkel and the rotten elites, she represents that must face a reckoning. They have promoted economic fantasies.

EU ploughed so much money into countries lending more, than they afford, and have de-regulated markets, and no fiscal policy, causing countries to collapse.

All Europe’s leaders have to offer, is broken societies and broken people, leaving them scarred and suffering from mental illnesses like depression and distress who are without jobs, housing, and hope. 

Anti-austerity forces will help to shift the balance of power in Europe.

It is cruel to target innocent businesses and businessmen as they have done nothing wrong. Imposing sanctions on them is punishing them for nothing, and leads to a slower economy or a stalled economy for other businesses and businessmen.

The EU is not heading for betterment or improvement. It is heading for disaster and without reforms, and the European Monetary Union is facing disaster with no reforms. There is no real democratisation within the European Union, and is a great failing  institution.

The only thing the European Union has got to show for are the great buildings of the European Parliament, Strasbourg and Brussels. And with no real foundations of democratisation, and no building of a real political structure that is workable.

We need reforms and democratisation without bureaucratisation. EU member countries are still divided on issues. We need strengthened organisation, not necessarily an advance guard of the countries who will decide on it.

To ensure democratic control with clean politics has to be done with global effort. No country can be excluded from having a say, and taking part in talks to shape the future of the European Union. No country must be discriminated against from having a say and taking part in talks, and be involved in the democratic processes.

It has to be a global effort as one country cannot live without the other, and all countries contributing to democracy will be successful, but not successful without each other.

The Eurozone is divided by different economic policies which is a contradiction to a universal economic policy yet to be invented for the Eurozone countries. The universal economic policy would unite into a body in an assembly rather than the parliament. It also calls for efficiency of the economy that is not politicised, and making it workable with democratisation in mind.

This helps all countries all over the world to find common ground to move forward, and speed up decision making processes. There has got to be a new alliance to shape the future of the new European Union with neutrality and impartiality. This way, we can get rid of inequalities in the European Union which are not supposed to be there.

The Euro is a failure presently because it is in the monetary union. The Euro can work without the monetary union. European Union must not be restricted to few members, it must be open to all countries who wishes to join without prejudice and bias. It must seek all things universal, and share the same policy such as the economy.

Euro Zone Government cannot function properly if one country has austerity policies, and the other has anti-austerity policies. It would collapse, as it has to be a united government tackling inequalities. Each country would all have a fair share of governance in economic growth and with no differences.

Countries are in favour of more integration, deeper cooperation, and have more Europe with unlimited circulation. To have common currency together with one other own currency, to have only one united fiscal and economic policies among member states as well as other states. We do need harmonised tax system as well as other systems.

If we share the same vision as I proposed here, there will never be a recession, record unemployment, stagnant economy, industrial decline and a population increasingly struggling to make ends meet. Tackling debts and borrowing would be a united effort. Integration and cooperation would end the sluggishness, lethargy and sickness of ailing Europe.

We all have to agree to make this vision work or it will be a disaster if it goes another way.

Some countries are on the brink of reforming the Asylum System, they have shut down borders. Schengen agreement have collapsed, due to uncontrollability of migration crisis. We have a new drug trade developing in Europe by Daesh to replace oil, which is a challenge to tackle for countries. Russia's Federal Migration Service have been so very well organised in getting refugees settled. I condemn the open door policy in Europe which has lead to uncontrolled influx of migrants especially as they are not Europeans.

This was not an organised migration service, and there was no migration service existing in Europe to start with compared to Russia who has got a Federal Migration Service causing chaos, insecurity as well as instability. Europe cannot take any more migrants as it is at breaking point due to lack of space and accommodation. The planning was impossible, due to open door policy which has a huge uncontrolled population of migrants entering Europe.

Countries are more in agreement, and is working in alliance. This has to continue without Angela Merkel and we need to stop the rot festering in Europe with her influence. Merkel is effectively kicked out as queen of europe with her senile tainted or dirty politics.

Europe can survive as long as the politics are squeaky clean and pragmatic. My role is to replace Merkel to guide European Union through troubled and stormy waters of politics. It is up to the countries to listen, and take action from what I say.

There is no reason why countries making global effort cannot stand up to the elite circle of the European Union if they do not agree with any of the policies. And there is no reason why the alliance cannot implement any sound policies. It is the countries who are involved in democracy, and making decisions together and not the elite.

Together we all could unite for a better strong world, but not in the existing EU. Democracy is calling for all countries to unite for restoring peace, security and stability so that we can have a united economy. European Union can no longer be a powerhouse of all countries.

They will always make mistakes, errors and going through all trials at the same time without learning anything and without tackling these challenges of the present economy. It is absurd for Europe to harbour a toxic asset on its borders undermining its chances of resuming sustainable growth and restructuring its economy instead of cultivating what could be a reliable source base for the continent.

Democracy would be seeking more integration of all countries so that the economy will always be stable and secure. I would not be astonished if no one mentioned sanctions on how to deal with them, and what the repercussions are.

Sanctions are the destitution and collapse of freedom producing new risks and uncertainties. They may lead to some wars in the economy, or certainly lacks doing freedom of trade and investments even existing ones. [not Russia].

Countries living in the European Union has everything to fear from its instability of the economy whenever sanctions are imposed on one country. There are global challenges still waiting to be tackled such as the future of the internet, global crime and anti-corruption, social inclusion, future of financial systems, food security and agriculture, long term investing in infrastructure and development, international trade and investment, employment skills and capital, environment and resource capacity and gender parity.

They do not seem to want to put the world to rights. All these people were supposed to come out stronger, refreshed and willing to tackle the most pressing problems of the world's economy addressing inequalities.

EU are already undermining the foundations of the welfare of the whole European world. The number of global challenges only grows and the future of the world directly depends on coordinated efforts of all countries especially in the fight against international terrorism. 

Russia has already built a bridge enabling CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organisation] to go international. Russia is getting more and more successful with SPIEF, the Davos Economic Forum is unfruitful and unsuccessful, failing year by year.

EU Heads of State or Government and the leaders of EU Institutions have said the terrorist attacks on Brussels Airport and Metro strengthens resolve to defend the European values and tolerance, and that it was an attack on open democratic society. That they will be united and firm in the fight against hatred, violent extremism and terrorism. Germany and Merkel have said that terrorism will not make Europe give up values of humanism, openness and freedom.

They are not talking about security, and have not said anything about a new policy on security. What they have said is all talk and no action. Some European countries have stepped up security, but are lacking intelligence. I do not agree with what the European leaders are saying especially Germany and Merkel saying about humanity, openness and freedom.

We cannot have openness and freedom if we are to protect mankind. European Union is so slow to protect humanity, if there are no security measures in place. European Union have neglected to develop a policy to protect humanity at airports, railway stations, metros etc.

There is no security policy in Europe to make sure all airports, railway stations, metros etc have a walk through multi zone door frame metal detectors. I cannot understand why they are not the standard procedure of the highest security to deal with terrorism to update.

The European Union have failed to implement security measures such as these, and also have failed the visa policy to curb migration.

Policies

The terrorist attacks all over the world especially in Europe is due to unwillingness of creating new policies to counter dissident groups such as fascists, nationalists as well as others. Western policies have been aggressive in the Arab world that have created a monster that eventually turned against its creator and bite the feeding hand. Some countries have been in ruins, and have become hotbeds of terrorism.

The United States and its European allies have made their political alliances with countries that nurtured and sponsored radical Salafi movements such as Daesh. Refusing to fix the mistakes is the paradox of some countries. Freedom of speech have been abused and freedom of movement have been abused.

With dissident groups still existing today displaying and chanting in support of Hitler or any founders of such groups. We are still having trouble putting the past behind us, as there are no policies created by the European Union to ban such groups.

I condemn the fascists taking part in parts of the world making agitation among the crowds and unsettling them. There is a reason to ban gestures and mentioning the words 'Hitler' and so on. No one wants to hear the words from the past ever again. Political parties needs to move on, and put the past behind them to avoid unrest, riots and possibly wars.

European Union has been misdirected by the elite circle, and does not care for the consequences. EU is the greatest threat to world peace and the world's economy. It has lost legitimacy and credibility whether it is leave or remain in the European Union, not only for UK but other European countries could follow, with Switzerland already taking the lead.

There will always be hostility and resentment by people who vote leave or remain while there is disproportionate power and influence cloaking itself in a mantle of political correctness or what have you.

Problems will always stay permanent until all those who work in the European Union should get out, so democracy can take over the reins of the main institution.

The European Union will have to choose if the workers and elite stay and remain, for their own health and safety. That is because more and more countries are standing up to the European Union and be their own authorities.

I say, get out while you can, so I can take over as leader to restore democracy. The European Union is no longer a democratic institution and a powerhouse, and there will be consequences to pay when the referendum is over whether it is remain or leave. 

We need strong leaders in 2016

Strong Leaders makes for a peaceful world. The global divisions have helped to create conflicts around the world with weak leaders and weak countries.

Strong leaders would put disarmament and non-proliferation back at the forefront of the international agenda. There would have been no extremism and terrorism if there was good updated politics and good updated constitutions. 

There is an existential threat to humanity on a large scale.

Expansionism is a very dangerous policy.

Only strong leaders would think about strong united security. There should have been sustainable development all around the world if we had not had a security problem.

We are beginning to think about new constitution for each country to think about the security, economy and other spheres in each country as well as migration.

We must not make the same mistakes electing weak leaders to create weak countries for the sake of humanity. They only throw the economy and security out the window.

There have been vast destruction around the world with catastrophic loss of lives, injuries, homelessness, malnutrition, deprivation of schooling for children as well as infrastructure.

2016 has got to be a year of rebirth, and we are now tackling terrorism and extremism. We have to deal with financial collapse of some countries which needs to be corrected, because everybody seem to abandon all sense of reality.

Economic stupidity is borrowing money to fund the good life no one can afford, leading to debts and ruin.

We are now being forced to go through important mind changes and driving us to a more self reliant way of life. Once we have dealt with unwanted wars and weak leaders, can we feel life is much easier and feel more relaxed protected by an important world security policy.

Strong leaders should be able to deal with external problems, have the duty to make its own citizens safe and secure and give quality of life just above poverty. To be organisational, have experience in administration such as in secretarial skills, be capable of making decisions and have a no nonsense approach.

The world leaders needs to be more cooperative, and unusually accommodating through the year with a much more stronger understanding, especially that politics needs to include undivided personal genuine religion to help them rule properly.

Otherwise the religious conflicts will not end for another hundred of years. They create dangerous issues that have been living with us for hundred of years already. 

I hope that people all over the world have shown a better understanding of many important issues, and to root out self interest, corruption, and playing with people's lives with political scorings. Integrity, self reliance and caring are badly needed in weak leaders. We are now approaching to the time when new constitutions have already been created and desperately need to create more for political stability and security.

Like President Putin, I also have endured harsh upbringing and endured hunger, poverty and sadness. This is something we have in common and this made us who we are giving us a very deep understanding and reasoning. We both felt and experienced the pain giving us great willpower and determination. Ideal mentality and disposition with instinctive understanding of power exist in both of us with pragmatism and religiously.

This is not so with weak leaders who have been born in an elite circle, and have had a very good upbringing not having felt any pain and problems in their childhood especially if they have rich parents.

These weak leaders have no understanding of the people at all, and can afford to buy Presidency or Prime Ministership. Buying a career is so wrong when no one would bother to start from the bottom of the ladder with a degree to its name.

Shockingly, some politicians do try and buy love from their constituents or other people emotionally.

I only respect and admire strong leaders with poor and painful background. We need strong leaders with great qualities, which I hope will happen more frequently.

It is essential and very important to go down the path of rooting out self interest, corruption and causing conflicts of any kind.

And I hope to be a leader very soon helping put the world to rights especially give children the rights, to schooling to dealing with a lot of world issues.