The true motive of NATO and its purpose

US is believed to have a cunning plan to invade Europe and feed fear to some Baltic countries.​ It would be a clever ploy to initiate the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine, in order for US to attempt to gain power by arousing people's emotions and prejudices. To seek support by appealing to popular desires, false claims and promises rather than by using rational argument. Something US is very poor at when it comes to communications. US likes to champion the cause of the common people as in ancient times, and is using NATO as an excuse to make its presence in the European countries known.

It is also an excuse to use the word 'Russian aggression' to expand its army while it is really not necessary to create posts and defence. The United States is thousand of miles from Europe and is across the vast seas.

Europe is not being attacked so US should not come to its defence, and it was unasked for. 

NATO is the real threat and have got nuclear weapons, something that is not welcomed by some European communities. The missile shields poses a threat to some countries as it will not deter but cause harm, especially if they creates shrapnel. Altogether, the presence of soldiers, tanks and weaponry are really threatening the communities, the borders and the Black Sea. Especially by air and sea.

It is warmongering and NATO wanted to justify its existence and is really seeking confrontation despite denials from NATO. US wanted to isolate Russia and also wanted Ukraine to be isolated from Russia. Which is why the alliance between NATO and Russia has come to a halt. 

NATO no longer wanted to have a practical cooperation with Russia in spite of having redundant arms and weaponry being far inferior from Russia.

Russia has repeatedly voiced its concerns not over the possible counteraction against its intercontinental missiles but over the violations of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty between Russia and the US on elimination of their intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.

​ Russia is keen to reduce nuclear missiles but not without cooperation.

NATO exercises are a provocation which threatens Russia and they are seen as an encouragement to attract violence and war for other European countries.​ NATO has no right to conduct exercises and is not obliged under international law while there is no war in Europe. And NATO does not live in Europe, it lives in US intending to increase the controllability and degree of influence on the European countries.

Europe is vulnerable to nuclear weapons that NATO possess in their territory indicating a huge time bomb. NATO is no longer interested in dialogue while manoeuvres were counterproductive to regional security and inflaming tensions. It is a very big mistake to think this alliance will bring security by military solutions and a policy for deterrence.

We do not need small or massive militarisation in Europe by NATO.

The problem is that we have NATO and Russia facing head to head so to speak, instead of one organisation to counter terrorism and extremism.

NATO really wanted to deploy battalions because they want to provoke a conflict and a cold war which it denies. It is a funny way to defend and protect each other without the consultations of democracy, while democracy is not being attacked.